Nickelback album 2016 professional#
Nickelback album 2016 download#

( talk- contrib) 09:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Alright! I think we have enoughs support then. Ducky610 ( talk) 08:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Since there is so much ambiguity and reverting, I also believe simply Rock would be the way to go. All sourcable genres for this album are a derivatives of rock. Anyone care to comment? Andrzejbanas ( talk) 19:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC) It's not the most specific genre cite, but it's one that would avoid any vandalism. It's accurate and no one would dispute it. Here is two sources for hard rock, surly that can replace Heavy Metal, post-grunge and alt metal I don't have a prblm with but come on, a little sence please, this is not Heavy Metal Ducky610 ( talk) 03:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Honestly, since there is so much vandalism and edit wars on this article about the genre I'd say we just simply leave it as ' Rock'. The only source for this can possibly be allmusic.

Heavy Metal? Heavy Metal? this album? you have to be kidding me. Just make sure that other dude stops POV editing it to make it seem like the album was well received - which it wasn't. Frvernchanezzz ( talk) 03:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC) Hey I'm perfectly okay with this introduction. You will be reported if you continue to disrupt Wikipedia. If the anon and Fio234 disagree, then discuss it here instead of edit warring. I believe this short introduction accurately reflect the overall impression of the album without going into to much detail.

Nickelback album 2016 professional#

' The album has received negative to mixed/average reviews from professional critics, however it has also garnered some positive reviews and won the JUNO Award for 'Album of the Year'.' I have written a non biased intro that clearly states both of these aspects:. However it is also true that some outlets did have a positive review of the album, and it did win a Juno award. It is true that the majority of reviews for this album were mixed to negative, as can be seen on the reviews in the infobox, and on the review aggregate website, Metacritic. There seems to be an edit war over the introduction of the reception section, with an anonymous user insisting on only stating the album received negative reviews, and Fio234, who insist on twisting the lead to make it seem as the album was very well received. That track has nothing to do with Dark Horse. Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting was released as a bonus track for The Long Road. Anyone know for sure? в™« РЇС”d xx в™Є в™« в™Є в™« в™Є Talk 17:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Nickelback album 2016 download#

I thought the download mp3 was Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting, being the 12th track. The last track on regular album is This Afternoon. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 09:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Wal-mart exclusive download

If you want to make a larger general statement, start a more expanded 'Reception' section taking into consideration reviews that aren't in the infobox. Cheers Andrzejbanas ( talk) 09:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Also, looking at my count, 5 of the reviews are negative. Which should be represented? We should base it on the reviews from. You can't ignore those, so you have to post some high ones. In general it did get some weirdly positive notable ones. You shouldn't cherry pick reviews to try to make it look like critics liked this album. This album was critically panned, yet most of the reviews chosen are mid to high rating. Could someone watch this? Andrzejbanas ( talk) 02:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Maybe they would stop adding more, if the review section was less biased. A user has ignored this statement and added a review. There should be no more then ten reviews in the infobox per WP:Albums. Says so on the official Nickelback website, that can't be wrong =) Cybersteel8 ( talk) 23:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC) Album reviews Track 5: Next Go Round or Next Go Around? Дoes anyone know for sure which it is? JaredInsanity ( talk) 05:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC) It's Next Go Round. 1 Track 5: Next Go Round or Next Go Around?.